dineshgowda24
Joined 6 years ago
Karma
153
Submissions
31
Member since
Jul 29
Recent submissions
Comment · 1 year ago
Yeah my bad. @ will show configurations. So you can set up your configurations to point a specific project(gcloud config set project PROJECT_ID) and then when you use @ and select a specific config and access the resources the project is auto applied to the urls and for resource searches as well
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks for the feedback. It does mean a lot.
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks for the feedback.
Actually, for AWS[0], it's already there. Being a prior user of it, that's where I got the idea to build for GCP after shifting to GCP.
You may want to consider adding new features to it or exploring the option of building for Azure. I'm pretty sure it's not currently available for Azure.
[0]https://github.com/rkoval/alfred-aws-console-services-workfl...
Comment · 1 year ago
Both of them are already supported. To select the project you can type @ and it will show you the list of available project. The fuzzy search is also already supported.
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for the feedback!
Hopefully, someone will do it, or perhaps you can try replicating the same approach for Keypirinha.
Comment · 1 year ago
Alfred is a Spotlight replacement for macOS.
https://www.alfredapp.com/
You can build any workflow based on your use case, and you can execute those right from your keyboard. Workflows are limited only by your imagination, like turning off Bluetooth, killing a process, emptying trash, and much more, just from a few keyboard strokes.
For example, this workflow allows you to open a specific service or resource page in the GCP console directly from the keyboard, eliminating the need to navigate to Google Cloud, search for the desired page, and then open it, which can be a time-consuming process. Also, lets you avoid the mouse altogether.
Comment · 2 years ago
Good point. I didn't give much attention to this part. I run some benchmarks and move these to compile only once. Thank you.
Comment · 2 years ago
Yes, it does right. Honestly, I couldn't find a better name. `Parse` sounds nice, so let me think about it.
Comment · 2 years ago
Yes, it makes sense. Thanks for the input. I have updated the documentation now.