dilutedh2o

hahaha amazing

cool!

it shows that finetuning a model on the epstein files makes it more dangerous

amen

I'm all for exposing and thwarting anti competitive practices but I want to see this happen on both sides of the spectrum.

Convenient for you to call it propaganda when it doesn't divulge the narrative you want to hear.

Anyone can make your argument, regardless of political stance.

What you end up with is the most convincing and popular narrative becoming the only lawful story that can be told.

No thanks.

Its soft and conducts at 70% of copper so it's great for contacts for electronic equipment

barely oxidizes

supply increases at a slow and sheady rate of about 2% a year

used for other electronics like circuit boards (not sure why to be honest, so might just be parroting this last point)

I'm curious too tbh, but I think that list is already pretty good (along with the fungibility and inner golumn arguments earlier in the thread)

ape do like shiny

Why not just let the natural selection play out

what about the people who don't want the market needlessly inflated by price floors?

A future of fact checking necessitates a future of narrative control. No thanks.

"This is also a side-effect of the the relative valuation of engineering time vs. the time of another function"

Not sure if author posted it but found a lil typo

I dont see the big deal to be honest. If youre using == you're probably approaching the conditional too sloppily to begin with