dhfromkorea

Joined 14 years ago

Karma
572
Submissions
152
Member since
Dec 14
a utilitarian monk.

website: dhfromkorea.com email: username[at]gmail

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Tempus AI | AI Scientist (Staff, Senior) | REMOTE (US) | Full-time | https://www.tempus.com

Tempus is a leading precision medicine AI company with an exceptional data flywheel in oncology: multi-modal data (pathology, DNA/RNA, spatial -omics, longitudinal outcomes, etc.) for millions of patients and deployment channels to the majority of the hospitals in the US.

As an AI scientist at AI Products group, you will build frontier clinical AI products for clinicians and life sciences partners, on top of our portfolio of foundation models in oncology. If you get excited about proving a novel product is feasible at all, or building predictive biomarkers for a new drug out of a small cohort, and you want impact beyond the benchmark results, this is the group for you.

Many of us come from Paige AI, the creators of Paige Prostate (the first FDA-cleared pathology AI application). We look for future colleagues who are smart, driven, and good at working out hard problems together.

Staff: https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/4387110060/

Senior: https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/4453706650/

Please apply and email donghun(dot)lee@tempus(dot)com

Referrals are very welcome.

Comment · 7 years ago
This is really cool. I searched for "Korea" and the third result was a page of Richard Stallman's website about his visit to Korea in 2000, from which I discovered he wrote about an array of big companies and why not to use them---pretty interesting. Last time I met him was in Finland. Such a consistent, profound character.
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
It would have been more interesting if they could share deeper, nuanced arguments for setting wealth as the objective function. Sure, wealth past a certain point admits a lot of freedom---but what next beyond that point? But the utility function over wealth (x: wealth, y: utility) is sub-modular in nature. When the curve gets flat, what metric must one use to measure her life's worth? Is there even one as such? Having followed their opinions for quite some time, I know they must have some good opinions on these...
Comment · 7 years ago
> The idea that priors are somehow ruining an "objective" model is just absurd to me.

I think some caution can be justified to a certain extent (not the blind "emotional" objections). When establishing priors in a low data regime, one must necessarily be careful. It's a knob whose mass can change a lot in the inference conclusion. That said, if we trust our belief about the region the available data do not inform us well of, why not utilize our domain knowledge/belief?

Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
I am not convinced. The attribution to the simple zoning system is surely not a complete proof, if any. Consider a counter-example: South Korea that has a very similar zoning system. Yet the housing price around Seoul soared roughly by 60% the past 3 years---so did rents (to a smaller but still significant rate). All the while the apartments supply has been at record high in 10 years. That zoning policy may be a factor but clearly not sufficient.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton