Recent submissions

Comment · 2 days ago
It can now be switched off
Comment · 2 days ago
The point about privacy has been made before and I see the value in it. But, users regularly share documents with third parties. In addition this was expected to be used primarily by non-business users (such as students) and in the future enhance privacy if people see value in it.

It doesn't work as a self-hosted service, because you need to be able to quickly share a link with other participants.

It's not a honeypot.

Comment · 2 days ago
No, it gets permanently deleted (not retained anywhere) when the user deletes it.
Comment · 2 days ago
Thanks for the feedback!
Comment · 2 days ago
No retention at all, not even a deleted folder: https://slidebyside.com/privacy

I wanted to see if anybody wants this too, and hopefully develop it into a business.

Comment · 2 days ago
The actual idea came to me back in University when I was presenting projects where I worked with other students. This way students can share a presentation only they can control.
Comment · 2 days ago
You have the option to limit if viewers can detach.
Comment · 2 days ago
I know. Kinda hard to develop trust, but I am considering making all slides E2E encrypted or at least have the option for it.

I wanted to first know if people would like something like this.

Comment · 27 days ago
This misses the point completely for repeated arguments that make no sense "Its historical ...".

The reality is, you lose programmatic control when you use HTML directly. Its much easier to have Dialog component that reacts to its state, than to use the native dialog tag.

Comment · 2 months ago
As the name suggest `std.debug.print` is a short hand for debug printing. In a CLI app for example you should use IO.
Comment · 2 months ago
Why? How do these relate?
Comment · 2 months ago
Good catch, wrote this on the go. The first stat is a study on Canadians, the second is from another source which is global.
Comment · 2 months ago
The lifetime risk is approximately 1.3% for women and 1.8% for men. For regular smokers: 11.2% for women and 14.8% for men. So about 15 to 30 more likely to get lung cancer. Bringing that down to 4x is close to "almost the same".

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton