davydog187

Touche, although that is a 5 line utility.

Filtering which search results? On hex.pm that’s irrelevant. On good “library name + elixir”

Early in the Elixir days, every library was named Thing-ex of ex-Thing.

IMO this is really lazy in terms of naming and from a usage perspective, you get really tired of typing that out in code.

I think we can do better

I have a personal mission to never name any libraries with the -ex prefix

Probably not, you should come to Code BEAM NYC, although a bit of a trek for you.

I will be trying to travel more in 2026

There is a fennel channel in the discord/slack if you're interested. I'm not sure how successful it has been

Thanks, I really appreciate that. While its not my main focus by any means, its been a really fun project to chip away at (both the higher level library and Luerl itself).

I do think that it has the potential to be really great with continued investment

Let me know if you have any questions, I'd be happy to assist

Thanks Josh, hope to see you soon, its been a while

Author here!

Luerl++ is not a valid module name :)

More seriously, I considered alternate names, but settled on this because it was short, literal, and given that its in the context of Elixir, makes sense when using it.

As you stated, the hope is to consolidate it into Luerl at some point

For most of the workloads you’re putting on the BEAM, they are IO bound and this is not of any consequence