datashow

Joined 7 years ago

Karma

597

Submissions

239

Member since

Oct 23

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago

So none of those great welfare countries gives a duck? Only the despicable USA cares those useless customer goods innovation. Good explanation.

Comment · 6 years ago

My question is "why not any of those places become the innovation engine of the world". I didn't even mention Australia.

Comment · 6 years ago

But no color, and no real gray scale.

Comment · 6 years ago

OK. Then why not any of those places become the innovation engine of the world? I heard people would become more creative and innovative under those circumstances.

Comment · 6 years ago

Critical Care Beds Per Capita

8 vs 34.7

https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2020/03/12/the-co...

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8

Comment · 6 years ago

He thought the stores could easily restock, and he would profit from online sale. Possible?

Comment · 6 years ago

"First" does not equal to "cause" either.

China’s first confirmed Covid-19 case traced back to November 17 scmp.com

2 datashow 6 years ago 0 comments

Comment · 6 years ago

Because there are already too much info on Twitter. No?

Comment · 6 years ago

I meant random accounts. Friends are definitely not bots, no?

Comment · 6 years ago

Why would I follow someone with only 73 followers in the first place?

I wish twitter can let me choose to filter out any information from accounts with less than 10000 followers, with exception of my own followings.

Comment · 6 years ago

Climate change is real doesn't mean NYC will be flooded.

Comment · 6 years ago

> beyond very basic hanging fruit like eliminating monogenic diseases etc.

So it does work.

Comment · 6 years ago

"geneticists today rightly treat eugenics as a laughable proposition"? Really? This author is not qualified to speak for geneticists.

Dawkins: It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.

https://mobile.twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/12289436869...

Crazy woke activitists like this author is not qualified to speak for science. They think if something is politically wrong must also be scientifically wrong. It is not.