dankai

Is this just a theory about an architecture or are there actually some benchmarks/results to substantiate it?

I've been working on research related to this in the context of diferent LLMs, and I can tell you that similarity != executability.

While you can make embeddings across different LLMs similar (i.e. universally looking) the few percentage of R2 that you are missing in translating the universal representation into a native representation are precisely those that make the hidden states executable in the LLM (which makes them useful).

They do this with simple embedding models because there the purpose of the embeddings is to measure similarity, but if you would like to use this principle to turn latent representations of one LLM into latent representations that are understandable/executably by a different LLM, you will fail.

Naive question: Why pile so much public money into quantum computing where there are (afaik) barely any useful algorithms, while Europe could instead invest in catching up on GPU infrastructure where there are plenty of known useful and capacity constrained use cases in academia and beyond?

Unfortunately says more about how competitive 3.5 pro would be today at the frontier if they forgo it for 3.6 flash.

No word about taxes and the paper describes workers as being “protected on the downside.” while the model has removed the downside risk that workers actually face. I could write a long essay with all the issues this "paper' has.

Truly dismal science of an Economics professor at MIT.

I resubmitted this because somebody flagged the original submission for unclear reasons and it had quite a lot of upvotes in a short time.

Perhaps some people are offended by this argument, but it's definitely worthy of a discussion instead of censorship.

Ever considered that they only attack the neighboring countries that attack them? They didn't strike Egypt or Jordan for that very simple reason.

> We agree with Geoffrey Hinton: machine intelligence is a threat to the human species.

> In response to this threat we want to inflict damage on machine intelligence systems.

I'm sorry but this sounds infinitely idiotic.

Naive question: Whats new about the finding that data quality matters when training an LLM?

This is so in character for Musk and shocking because he's incompetent across so many topics he likes to give his opinion on. Crazy he would nerf the model of his AI company like that.