danhergir

grouping groups is not an actual feature since it can get you to have nested tasks eventually overcomplicating your workflow. personally, i am not attracted to having more than 6-7 sessions since i like to take good care of the context.

what's your workflow?

currently what i do is setting up a group for a set of sessions/agents, once this is done, i'll name the group based on the task/activity which is being completed.

by doing this i can move between several tasks, see the current status of each session, and even use Blueprints to send a message to a certain group of sessions/agents

in other words, it works well because it doesnt make out weird names.

Hey, I am more than happy to answer questions. Please try Blueprints with Seshions, I used to have to spawn the same 4-agent setup every time manually. Now it's just one keypress.

This sounds as a great opportunity to use this as an RL env to train drones for defense purposes.

How does this compare to using Nano Banano or Seedance 2.0?

I definitely am going to give it a try, it's been a while looking for something like this. Had an experience with Cap, but when you use the camera, the recording breaks

What if you just use words

What coding agent are you using at your workplace?

One of the use cases i see for this tool is helping companies to understand the output coming from the llm blackbox and the process which the employee took to complete a certain task

I've used Ghostty in the past, but nowadays it's hard to use it since you have to take in count that running agents requires using tmux sessions which is something Ghostty does not support very well

I went through the article, and it makes sense to me that we're getting names as an output, but why doing so with names?