Recent submissions

Comment · 5 months ago
INDX anticipation intensifies!
Comment · 5 months ago
Seems like a backdoor.
Comment · 7 months ago
SU was amazing. Stumbling upon Ze Frank? It was internet gold!
Comment · 9 months ago
I also like it. At one point I had my team move all of our team management to it as well. It was a little bit painful as first, but once you understand the issue, epic, milestone hierarchy it was it was great. The board feature that does kanban was cool. Switching from dedicated ec2 runners to pods in our cluster was less awesome…
Comment · 9 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
LM, nthash aka NTLM, net-ntlmv1 aka ntlmv1, net-ntlmv2 aka NTLMv2. Challenge response stuff is different. Naming here is painful.
Comment · 9 months ago
NTLM is often used for more of the underlying technologies, some more secure than others… nthash, net-ntlmv1, net-ntlmv2. There’s a little more complexity here and this is different than the stuff that was out 15 years ago
Comment · 9 months ago
NTLM is not Net-NTLM- l0pht did ntlm
Comment · 1 year ago
Go with Ceph… a little more of a learning curve but overall better.
Comment · 1 year ago
Are you concerned about potential CFAA issues?
Comment · 1 year ago
Thx. I have TOP pulled up- I’ll take a peek at GoRails as well. There are other things like Hotwire that I’d like to understand but will come back to that after I get a hand on the framework.
Comment · 1 year ago
Cool recomm. I’ll check it out - web containers seems like a poor idea for a development course but I suppose it removes setup complexity.
Comment · 1 year ago
This combined with the $20K electric truck looks promising.

I just hope something like the blue rhino propane tank for batteries to offer a Battery drop in.

Comment · 1 year ago
That’s cool. These are my expectations. Company 1 wins contract and builds something, key team members are experienced with making and navigating the “process”. Company 2 copy/pastes. They have not performed any work yet but they entered a bid X years later and bring up the years of “mediocre” dev Company 1 has done. There is only existing company 1 work and only hope of company 2. Contracting Officer chooses company 2 because promises sound good!

Reality, company 2 wins on cost and doesn’t understand the context of what was built or the environment it was built in. They don’t understand the costs as they didn’t pay them. Company 2 quickly proposes “full rewrite!” Lower cost labor they brought in can’t perform and quality degrades till we have (insert Gov software program here).

Or it doesn’t happen.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton