confiscate
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
if Remdemsivir cures 100% of all Covid-19 cases, halfway through the trial, they would have enough data to show a net positive benefit. They don't need to finish the whole trial to declare Remdemsivir useful
the fact that they are running the whole trial to finish, most likely means the effect of Remdemsivir is not too noticeable. They need more data to get to statistical significance. Hence, they want the trial to run to original planned finish date.
my guess is
Remdemsivir probably has some positive effect. Say, 10% lower death rate if used during 1st few days of infection. Still great, much much better than our current situation of nothing. It would not cure Covid completely, but it would help substantially, especially in large populations of infected
ironically, this happened in a previous 2019 trial of Remdemsivir, for a different virus, Ebola
in that trial, 4 drugs for Ebola were tested, including Remdemsivir. 2 non-Remdemsivir drugs succeeded substantially--the large difference between those drugs and Remdemsivir, was enough to cause the investigator to end the trial early and drop Remdemsivir
ironically, the investigator for that trial was none-other-than Dr. Fauci. Maybe that's why he hasn't mentioned Remdemsivir much on TV these days, based on his past professional disappointing experience with Remdemsivir
also, double ironically, Remdemsivir was initially designed to treat Ebola virus, not for flu or coronavirus type viruses. The fact that after the Ebola trial, Remdemsivir was declared not that effective for Ebola (the very virus Remdemsivir was created for), means there is even less of a chance Remdemsivir will prove to be effective for Covid-19 in the current trials
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/finally-some-good-ne...
by and large consumers don't care if the company is for social change or not.
it's difficult for a company to succeed in getting customers to pay based purely on social change intentions. That's how a market works
like you said in 2008 there wasn't anything there. They lose millions the whole company dies
now Tesla operates in billions of dollars. They lose billions it's still only 10%
The 1st leaked email about burning cash over 10 months, causing the stock to crash even more
"where there's a will there's a way". So by your logic he wants the stock to go down
The 1st leaked email about burning cash over 10 months
How convenient that email leaked when the stock price is getting clobbered, adding insult to injury.
How convenient
Congrats Geoff! Much deserved. Looking forward to seeing great things at YC
The original post and every article online is citing Elon's email
Sensational headlines declaring Elon says Tesla will die, are headlines that generate clicks and views