coldnose

E621 isn’t even mentioned in the article, but of course it comes before pornhub in the title on HN X3

Hmm, single life isn’t so bad

I’m wary of these kinds of stories, where someone PR-savvy with a grudge lobs nebulous complaints against a company. Can anyone at BO without a grudge substantiate this “toxicness”?

This seems like a trivial case of Betteridge’s law of headlines.

For integer primitives, all possible values are valid. Just allowing binary initialization for structs that consist of integer types would allow compatibility with C structure. As it is, I have to either resort to unsafe code or manually deserialize every struct

I really wish there was a safe way to initialize structs with arbitrary binary data in rust. Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems intuitively safe, especially if the struct only contains integer primitives.

Hear hear

I'm no fan of RMS, but it does seem cruel to oust him for just one of his (innumerable) faux pas.

N=50

What an awful headline

Like that GAN that simulates Pac-Man, this is an exciting new level of inefficiency I couldn't even conceive of a couple decades ago.