coderintherye

I imagine amongst this crowd that I won't be the only one who refuses to give up my biometrics to X to continue to use it. Otherwise, I enjoyed my 19-ish years on Twitter.

The author of this substacks shows no credentials of being a licensed physician. Further, the author states in other articles that Covid vaccines caused, and I quote, "turbo cancers".

This person is a quack, which is too bad as the actual discussion over statins could be an interesting one.

If AI submissions, then why not go a step further and have AI reviewers?

Perhaps this will help bring more scrutiny to the metric of publishing quantity not being as valuable as it has been treated.

No they didn't, that was merely a proposal.

How do you know it didn't just get the result from the web?

Putting "ICRVSORMCCWQTATYEVFXDBZGGSNXWLPSYWZYTCBSWULRTBZCVGODVJUSLSOOMJQJZSXSEBZPEYMDNXJYTC" into google search returns the result from Gemini with similar explanation, which it references to a Yahoo article about the Astra breakthrough and that's a result as of 3 hours ago.

This just links to xcancel's captcha.

The last paragraph does the heavy-lifting.

Everyone has a different idea of what is permissable. We can't even solve alignment amongst humans, what makes us think it is possible to solve alignment with AIs? It's irreducible complexity.

I have to wonder if some us are just much more inured to salespeople and thus also to "AI Safety" propaganda. I've yet to have a logical discussion with anyone who thinks the "AI Safety" people should be in charge and I think they just truly don't that what most them actually want is to be the one holding the keys to power.

Public trains are covered in camera surveillance and that footage is very often used in conjunction with tracking down and prosecuting criminals. You should have no expectation of privacy on a public train.

Waymo's mission is literally "to be the world's most trusted driver"

They put safety above all else and actually goal to it.