clessg

Joined 12 years ago

Karma
6,375
Submissions
673
Member since
Apr 2
Full-stack engineer in Moncton, Canada. Focused primarily on Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView nowadays. Also JavaScript/TypeScript, React, Svelte, Go, Postgres, MySQL, and PHP. Dabble in Rust and Zig sometimes (but never for anything serious, of course).

Contact: chris <at> crystala <dot> io

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
> Today, everyone's dad work at Nintendo. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I just so happen to run an old online fan made Pokemon game where people can be banned for misbehavior (e.g. cheating). Let's just say I can confirm this sentiment.

Comment · 1 year ago
Inspectors General have a special provision in the law regarding removal or relocation:

> The removal procedure for presidentially appointed IGs is found in Title 5, Section 403(b), which reads in part An Inspector General may be removed from office by the President. If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress (including the appropriate congressional committees), not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.

So it's illegal because he didn't notify Congress in advance. That statute was enacted in 2022 specifically to prevent abuses of power such as this.

Comment · 1 year ago
Good point! It's always fascinating when the sergeant at arms is actually employed since it's so seldom used. I'm sure Congress wouldn't go down that path with Trump for many many reasons, but perhaps it could be used against lower-level minions in extreme situations. Probably not, but fascinating to consider :)
Comment · 1 year ago
> But at that mechanistic level, so does the President. He isn’t personally escorting her out of the office.

Fair enough, I strongly hope a good number of folks within the government show a backbone and resist unlawful or abusive orders however they can. Unfortunately those same people can easily be fired and replaced with somebody appropriately loyal (as is already happening). So, unfortunately, I'm not terribly optimistic.

Popular backlash seems to be fairly effective so far at least, so there is some hope. (For example the federal funding freeze which ended almost immediately after a flurry of confusion and outrage. Allegedly ended, anyway - it's not exactly clear in reality.)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton