cleer
Joined 16 years ago
Karma
46
Submissions
14
Member since
Jan 3
Joined 16 years ago
Unfortunately, didn't really get any momentum (mainly because there's just a long pipeline of things that are higher priorities), but maybe it'll go somewhere in the future. I agree that it's a weak point.
Would be cool to get more opinions on it.
Also note that the buttons in the header area of Google+ are <a> tags, probably since they actually link to separate pages. I guess that's Google's practice.
http://forrst.com is invite-only and caters to both designers and developers, but it fits the bill.
If you want to blame someone for this, blame Mozilla, but honestly, it's probably just an innocent mistake. This search app seems rather new (I just noticed it the other day, too) and probably doesn't get much usage, which I suspect is why it's not hooked into all the main app preferences yet. Jumping the gun to criticize Google here is... unfortunate.
For comparison, here's what the Google Search app looks like: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.and...