ckevinc
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Google's cache of the article: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ti31eUM...
I have thought of two types of insidious activities on sites today, the onclick popup and the confirm on close.
The onclick popup can be managed (to a small extent) in Chrome by holding the CTRL key and clicking when you have a sense a popup is coming. It doesn't cover all of them, but if you're familiar with a site's actions, you might catch 70% or more of them.
I'm not sure what creates the confirm on close, but I see it on sites that auto play video advertisements (among others). Once you try and close the window/tab - Chrome displays a prompt - requiring you to close the prompt, and then close the tab. Annoying.
I thought of one simple idea in Chrome - have a key combination (perhaps CTRL+SHIFT) that we can hold down while clicking on a link or possible popup, that will (a) open the link in a new tab and (b) NOT load the page or any elements. It simply presents an empty page with the url that we could copy or a tab we can close.
This would add a measure of control and hopefully doesn't break anything.
I look forward to seeing how this project unfolds and I appreciate you taking the time to read my suggestions.
Kevin
But, after seeing your video, and the number of times a user has to click on different elements - it's clear this is not a simple logging tool. I also think the video could be (a) called out above the fold and (b) include some sort of voice over.
I feel there is a market ready and waiting for those that work on more abstract sorts of things. Situations where work might form more organically from a blog post on http://blogging.cwl.cc (it's happened) or a small idea (more frequent), and eventually turns into billing or a larger scale project. With tools like these that are project-based - It feels like logging friction is much to high.
The problem is not being solved (in my opinion) because generally no one wants to log what they do, but for those that have decided to do so, there should be little to no clicking and a process to capture everything written in very low overhead manner (mobile support is essential).
So far, no tool seems to be as good as a simple OTA sync'ed calendar. So far.
"This may happen if you try to launch an XAF Windows Forms application at the workstation with Windows XP or an older Windows version installed. These systems do not have Microsoft .NET Framework installed by default. Download and install the .NET framework of the appropriate version from the Microsoft website (version 3.5 for Windows XP or version 2.0 for earlier Windows versions) or upgrade to Windows Vista or Windows 7."
These things are brutal. You'll loose a possible customer the second he/she sees a non-descript error like this.
One thing I would mention, test it on different versions of Windows. CRMfly does not appear to work post-install on Window XP --> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6629489/img/CRMfly.png
In all this, there is some sense that we (as Canadians) are fundamentally different than our American friends. I do agree (it's just a feeling) that these perceived differences are holding us back in many ways.
Could this be culture? Could this be our more left-leaning ideologies? Could there be some small thinking involved?
As a Canadian who was invited to partake in the American workforce more than once but decided on staying here - I believe Canada has more to offer than America.
http://imgur.com/LpwJ3Nn
Running Chrome 36.0.1985.143 on OS X