ciarcode
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
64
Submissions
27
Member since
Mar 1
Recent submissions
Comment · 6 months ago
Well, this is used in the automotive domain for long time now. Look at matlab/simulink: you can draw your algorithm as a state machine and generate the code out of it. Recently I implemented a state machine to manage a quite complex react component, who moves from one visual state to another through some css transitions. It’s not a difficult state machine, but I think people are not so well versed in it.
Comment · 1 year ago
In the post, they specifically talk about two points that seems to address some of your doubts
1. “We expect to have a more curated API that is informed by critical use-cases (e.g. linting, transforms, resolution behavior, language service embedding, etc.).”
2. “We also can imagine opportunities to optimize, use other underlying IPC strategies, and provide batch-style APIs to minimize call overhead.”
Anyway, I’ve used the compiler API a lot too, and I really enjoy its huge capabilities, making possible practically everything on the source code (EDIT: and hijack the build process too). I hope we won’t miss too much.
Comment · 1 year ago
I think they answered in their FAQ here: https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/discussions/455#d....
If I got it correctly, they created a node native module that allows synchronous communication on standard I/O between external processes.
So, this node module will make possible the communication between the typescript compiler GO process, that will expose an “API server compiler”, and a client side JavaScript process.
They don’t think it will be possible to port all APIs and some/most of them will be different than today.
Comment · 3 years ago
Ah ok, that kind of lager!
Comment · 4 years ago
What about SETs?
Comment · 4 years ago
It’s a war among poor people, that the ruling class love to maintain power.
Comment · 4 years ago
In automotive, development of control algorithms for the engine is entirely “visual”, through simulink/matlab. You design the model on simulink, then it generates the C code. I don’t have direct experience outside the automotive sector, but I believe that this approach is used in other sectors like aerospace. Maybe designing models is better than writing low level code for control algorithms?
Comment · 4 years ago
You do maybe
Comment · 4 years ago
I don’t think you’re really Italian ahahah
Comment · 4 years ago
These days remember us that is better to have top class military. I’m sad about it, but this is the reality, I guess.
Comment · 4 years ago
I always think to priority-based scheduling in this way. Maybe it can help someone else.
The scheduler will always schedule the highest priority task among ones in the ready queue, but at different times.
- If preemptive, the scheduler will schedule the higher priority task (higher than the currently running one) as soon as it enters the ready queue.
- If non preemptive, the scheduler will schedule the higher priority task only when the running one terminated or explicitly call a yield() (call to yield --> cooperative)
In principle, you can mix both scheduling types, making some tasks "non-preemptable" and other tasks "preemptable".