chychiu

Not sure why this is linked. The field has kind of moved on from DAPO

Super cool work! What's next? Do you think with longer memory limits more interesting programs might emerge? Or is it substrate dependent?

Your website is broken btw - Clicking into another article through related work goes to the same page

If you mean this in a psychedelic context, my theory is the temporary dissolution of this “society” in recognising the “self” as “self”

Considering that brainfuck only has 8 characters and models are scoring at 6.2% I don't think tokenization is the issue

Was going to comment the same but you beat me to it!

On that note, reading the ChatGPT-esque summary in the linked article gave me more brain damage than any AI I've used so far

I am sorry to hear that OP, I hope you fight the good fight and wish you all the best.

On a different note, a quick cursory glance of this company really makes me wonder who even gave them $160M? The company site is soulless and filled with corporate jargon, and the whole company smells of bloat and leadership team is a long list of people in bullshit jobs. Is this where VC money goes these days? I am dumbfounded by the degree of mismatch between capital and utility

I work in building software as medical device. Can confirm it’s still a quagmire

Actually that is decent data and reflective of current SOTA in terms of cost performance tradeoff

I get your point, but wouldn't it be worse to have surgery for the rich and no surgery for the poors?

They are not intrinsically truth seekers, and any truth seeking behaviour is mostly tuned during the training process.

Unfortunately it also means it can be easily undone. E.g. just look at Grok in its current lobotomized version

Doctor here

1. It’s generally difficult to quantify such risks in any meaningful manner

2. Provision of any number adds liability, and puts you in a damned-if-does, damned-if-it-doesn’t-work-out situation

3. The operating surgeon is not the best to quantify these risks - the surgeon owns the operation, and the anaesthesiologist owns the patient / theatre

4. Gamblers quantify risk because they make money from accurate assessment of risk. Doctors are in no way incentivised to do so

5. The returned chance of 1/3 probably had an error margin of +/-33% itself