Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 8 months ago
Comment · 10 months ago
> “As an aside, I think there may be an increased reason to use dynamic interpreted languages for the intermediate product. I think it will likely become mainstream in future LLM programming systems to make live changes to a running interpreted program based on prompts.”

Curious whether the author is envisioning changing configuration of running code on the fly (which shouldn’t require an interpreted language)? Or whether they are referring to changing behavior on the fly?

Assuming the latter, and maybe setting the LLM aspect aside: is there any standard safe programming paradigm that would enable this? I’m aware of Erlang (message passing) and actor pattern systems, but interpreted languages like Python don’t seem to be ideal for these sorts of systems. I could be totally wrong here, just trying to imagine what the author is envisioning.

Comment · 1 year ago
What stack are you running? How do you guarantee sequential consistency of order numbers across your app server regions, cache layers and data lakehouse?
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
Compelling video!
Comment · 1 year ago
Great point. Erlang is still going strong, in fact WhatsApp is implemented in Erlang
Comment · 1 year ago
Yes StarCon2 / Masters of Urquan also hold up really well

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton