christoph-heiss

Neither Forgejo nor Codeberg are owned by _any_ company. Very important distinction.

And all the text is grey-on-grey and basically unreadable. Not to even mention accessibility.

That's why any repo with a README ridden with emojis (and other telltale signs) is just an instant nope nowadays.

(One of the only good things about GH is, that if you block some account, it will tell you if that account contributed to some repo at the top. Makes it very easy to filter out slopcode.)

Yeah. Unfortunately, just goes to show how many people think Git = Github.

I think that they felt the need to offer such a service says everything, basically admitting that LLMs just plagiarize and violate licenses.

Oh yeah, but LLMs ingesting and spitting them out is not piracy. Right.

No? Licenses still apply even if you _don't_ get sued?

Not sure why you are getting downvoted, given that the original site is such a jarringly user-hostile mess.

Well, given the subject ..

Fortunately, at least in Europe, there are definitely companies still around who either don't force the usage of slop machines or even have a culture of rejecting them completely (yes, that's a thing, and I'm glad to be working at such a company).

So no, this isn't universally true.

Why are you using LLMs then, if you enjoy the actual process of thinking about a problem and solving it by writing code?

It's definitely a more enjoyable world this way.

> Now I code from my phone.

Except that you are doing anything else but coding here. Coding involves writing code, which isn't actually done by the author here.