charlieok
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
When the answer to a "how do I do X on windows" question begins with "start WSL", my primary reaction is frustration because they're basically saying "there's not a good way to do that on Windows, so fire up a Linux VM".
Just to pick my most recent example, from today. I wanted to verify the signatures on some downloaded rpm files, and the rpm tools work on linux. I know, rpm files are native to a family of linux distros, so it's not surprising that the tools for retrieving and verifying their signatures don't work on windows but... it also seems reasonable to want a world where those tools can install and run on windows, straight from a PowerShell session, with no VM.
Multiply that by all the little utilities that that can't be deployed across multiple operating sytems, and it just seems like some incompatibility headaches are never really going to go away.
National elections for a few of the most significant ones (e.g. secretary of state, attorney general). Maybe Congress appoints the rest.
When designing a system to be resistant to attack, it helps to split up roles. A "superadmin" type of role is a vulnerability. Similar idea here.
https://www.pacifict.com/story/ https://www.circa.bio/
Although as far as I can tell, Circa Solar isn't open source. But maybe there's another similar thing that is?I always liked the idea of an "apparent solar time" watch face, and never did find a way to do that with Apple Watch.
https://rossulbricht.medium.com/decentralize-social-media-cc...
Then they got an unexpected rush of users from Elon buying twitter. Many/most of those users weren't coming because of bluesky's mission of decentralization -- they mainly wanted a twitter alternative, and bluesky had built one.
Bluesky could have, at that point, let their original decentralized ideal languish in the icebox column and said "oh well, we pivoted". Their new user base would have been mostly fine with that. Silicon Valley would have been mostly fine with that. Twitter itself has that kind of abrupt pivot in its origin story.
That's not what they did, though.
This post is a good recounting of what they did:
https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/bluesky
With the size team they were working with, I think they've been punching well above their weight.
These are legitimate concerns but give them a chance. That funding round was announced slightly over a week ago.
* They kept relevant information from her, including studies they'd done on the subject before
* They sidelined her research efforts and made her feel unwelcome there
* She grew to dread the subject and avoided staying involved with it
* "when friends asked Hansen about PFAS, she would change the subject. Still, she repeatedly told [her husband] — and herself — that the chemicals were safe."
I guess you could read that as saying 3M "convinced" her if you really wanted to, but I'd have looked for a different way to describe it. It helps to remember that article authors don't usually get to write the headline.Censorship resistance is a nice principle that I agree should carry a lot of weight in a lot of situations, but it isn't everything.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240324073604/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_AI