chaoz_

pushing for chip-agenda as the best-isolation-layer immediately makes sense given their business

Too much text. The only question I have and want to see at the top is whether it's more human aligned than LLMs (or, potentially, overfit)

Agree, it's something that will eventually teach your developers to ignore points raised as it's mostly garbage.

There is something about using the most advanced tooling possible. Why would you pay for IntelliJ, if Eclipse can do the same thing a bit worse?

You want to master your craft, develop "optimal" systems, understand where things are going by utilizing SOTA.

You can call it FOMO, but you get the point.

What tool do they use for diagrams?

I worked at a very large EU tech company, that spent a lot of effort (and moneys) to become DSA compliant. So, you're over-projecting here.

I simplified this argument to highlight that we’ve seen this exact pattern before.

If you're just building a non-security-sensitive frontend to validate market traction, it makes total sense to go full AI. The commenter working at a 10-person company getting flamed for not using AI to iterate aggresively against competitors has a super valid point.

Validation methods will evolve to accommodate human laziness. Insisting on doing it the hard way is no different than the old-timers who used to claim engineers 'weren't skilled' if they didn't know how to use punch cards.

Do you also inspect and study what assembly code your program was compiled to?

// Obviously LLMs are non-determenistic etc and it depends on your domain, but your VP's point 100% makes sense if you folks are trying to cook up another demo-CRUD apps to convince investors for another funding round

It surprises me how JetBrains managed to lose such a great market opportunity.

I don't think they ever going to be able to re-claim large chunk of developers who are now fine with thin VSCode-like + Terminal for non-JVM languages.

Perfect example of how large corp with research capacity failed to navigate their product changes.

Genuinely curious, is there any way to estimate amortization of Mac?

I’d imagine 1 year of heavy usage would somehow affect its quality.

Solid q. I think the part of it is that it’s really easy to attract some “mass” (capital) of users, as there are definitely quite a few of idle Macs in the world.

Non-VC play (not required until you can raise on your own terms!) and clear differentiation.

If you want to go full-business-evaluation, I would be more worried about someone else implementing same thing with more commission (imo 95% and first to market is good enough).

Fun question: can some (part of it) be a crypto token that I can buy? :))

That would finally be a crypto thing which is backed by value I believe in.

That solution actually makes great sense. So Apple won in some strange way again?

Guess there are limitations on size of the models, but if top-tier models will getting democratized I don’t see a reason not to use this API. The only thing that comes to me is data privacy concerns.

I think batch-evals for non-sensitive data has great PMF here.