chaosprint

nice animation. but can you convince me to switch from Codex?

Using AI to learn objective things is acceptable. However, as long as it's combined with your own experience, because AI can't possibly understand your entire world, any subjective answers will be disgusting, disastrous, obsequious, and boring.

I doubt if those models already knew this pelican test...

I bought a Claude membership a few days ago. I asked him to fix a React issue—a very simple UI modification with almost no logic. He still failed to understand it. And after three attempts, the 5-hour limit was reached. This was a disaster. I had to immediately buy a CodeX membership and also tried Image2. I won't give Claude another chance.

what a roller coaster

I doubt if esp32s3's power consumption can be used in real life.

Well written. I also wrote in my personal notes yesterday that if you don't organically and continuously develop code, it's hard to say you truly "own" it.

Like self-driving cars, at least you remember the scenery along the way, but now it just teleports you to another place and then shows you the recording.

This kind of review is ineffective. Such ghosted code might be acceptable for small tools, but for databases or similar systems, it's really worrying.

I've now basically stopped granting the agent any write permissions and returned to how I wrote codes 2 years ago with manual QA. The thing is, it's actually more efficient in turns of tokens and the results.

That's just my personal experience.