cg505

Does Anthropic not just have right of first refusal? They seem to imply that any sale, purchase, or transfer of stock is actually impossible, which seems hard to believe.

I think you mean December 2025, not 2024.

The author specifically discusses their efforts to avoid this sort of information leak which would obviously poison the result.

I had this happen as well. I opened a support ticket and shortly afterwards, many or all of the non-infringing forks were restored.

Whelp, seems they fixed this as I was typing the post.

1. They need to charge users for generation.

2. They might get into trouble charging users to generate some other entity's IP, so they may revenue-share with the IP owner.

They're probably still losing money even if they charge for video generation, but recouping some of that cost, even if they revshare, is better than nothing.

The voice is really good, especially small details like sharp air intake before a response to indicate tone. I guess the conversation topics weren't amazing but that's not really the point.

The problem I have is that if you want to engage with something like this, you need to pretend it's a human. As they say, the uncanny valley was pretty much successfully crossed. And to be honest, I don't want to pretend I'm talking to a human for a whole bunch of reasons.

The technically aspects are really impressive, but I think "pretending to be a human" in this way is a pretty scary goal. The cognitive dissonance was too strong and it was hard for me to continue a conversation very long at all. What does it even mean to have a conversation without theory of mind?

Your quote is misleading. The "he" is in the next paragraph and refers to someone else who owns a Cadillac, not a Corvette.

The track day thing probably was the funniest thing in the article, though.

Bitwarden is a great choice. It is open source, has browser extensions and a CLI, and you can self-host the syncing backend if you want.

It is interesting, though, that a portion of the article is dedicated to discussing how it's important to make the proof simpler and more generally available. Although machine-verifiability is surely a good goal, it can't replace humans being able to comprehend the proofs as well. In this world where proof can all be verified, we may be more confident in our mathematical knowledge, but we'll also be unable to generate new knowledge.

There are a ton of networks (think big corporate networks, schools, shared apartment wifi) that enforce too many weird port restrictions. Many of those places rarely get network or config updates. I don't think it's as bad as IPv6, but there are a lot of people for whom it isn't going to just work out of the box.