Recent submissions

Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Firstly, thank you so much for taking the time to browse through our site, Coryl and thank you for providing the critique. As hard as it is to read such a damning verdict, this is exactly the reason for this question.

I think we will stick with OvaFlow as the name and therefore OvaFlow Agents and Environment are necessary. I can understand how 'An OvaView' etc can become grating though and will probably ease off with this puns.

We fully agree with the fact that there is too much text and needs to be simplified down. Bulletpoints, simple sentences and images/diagrams will take precedence.

This has always been our worry with the site, the fact that the product isn't fully explained. Hopefully we can address this.

We are looking to make changes and hopefully get improved feedback next time!

In the meantime, any more feedback from other users will be hugely appreciated. Even if you 100% agree with this critique, please share your opinion.

Comment · 12 years ago
I can't think of anything worse.
Comment · 12 years ago
I don't think is necessarily a bad thing. You sound like a good starter of projects. For one reason or another you haven't followed them through. Either you haven't been truely interested enough to follow it through to the next stage and let yourself properly invest or you need a colleague that gets excited about projects with you to help drive each other along.

You're a step further than I get. But I see myself more as someone that will run with a project as oppose to creating one.

Good luck finding the one that sticks!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton