ccorda

Joined 18 years ago

Karma
450
Submissions
61
Member since
Jul 5
d13b2ac1c6b22c9a1557ee5a5dd4f41855f65133
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
I agree that payments on their own (e.g. salary, bonuses) don't seem counter to the non-profit's interest. But what if we're talking about 100B of equity -- equity that otherwise would have gone to the parent non-profit?
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
In case it goes away, or if you're international and can't see, this seems like a good usage of Community Notes for added context and is currently published:

  Regulatory Credits on account for a small percentage of Tesla Revenue.

  2020: 6.2%
  2021: 3.2%
  2022: 2.7%

  As of FY Q3 2022 Credits were only $287m against profits of $3.3b

  https://twitter.com/FonsDK/status/1591489889924976640
  TSLA Q3 2022 IR Deck: shorturl.at/mow47
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
I'd recommend this article for a deeper look at how Zillow and its competitors exhibited different behavior in Phoenix as the market cooled:

https://www.mikedp.com/articles/2021/10/19/ibuying-is-hard-z...

> As the market cooled between August and September, Opendoor and Offerpad purchased fewer houses, while Zillow purchased more.

> The iBuyers also adjusted to changing market conditions by paying less for houses. The median purchase price in Phoenix peaked in August. Opendoor and Offerpad's median purchase price also peaked in August before tracking the market and declining in September. But Zillow kept paying more and more.

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
This is going to apply to every employee at every company, regardless of whether they have a celebrity CEO or a clickbait friendly name.

In California, EDD released guidelines today: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/networth/article/Califo...

"Even if your employer has complied with the state’s requirements for reopening, and any and all government safety regulations, you would have good cause to refuse to return to work if you are at greater personal risk due to higher risk factors as identified by the” California Department of Public Health. These factors include being older than 65, having a weakened immune system or having certain serious chronic health conditions, such as heart disease, lung disease or diabetes."

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton