cc_ashby

This is really interesting. I have felt for the past couple years that the moldability of Common Lisp lends agents the appropriate affordances to “do the right thing” via experimentations.

I see there is a section on RLMs; have you ran Autolith via agentic benchmarks? I would love to see comparisons with Prime Agent.

Forth is unbelievably underrated and I think its value is locked in poor DX.

Hey Alex, we actually had a very similar idea this morning! I could not find your contact anywhere, would love to chat. This is really cool.

Maybe you can use Mercurial for this? You don’t need the complexity of Git for memory.

Could you share the code for some of the custom threading macros you created? Looks very useful.

Tacit programming + llm control library (like LangChain) has a lot of untapped potential. Tacit programming shines when the control structures are simple (and functions/variables can be anonymized), and these patterns occur frequently in programming on top of llms.

For those who have the book, what is contained in the "discussion of the interactive Lisp programming process" as mentioned by Paolo?

Forth really changed the way I think. I now take notes in a Forth-like way. Very underexplored.

In my experience, perfectionism is crafted post-procrastination. It probably makes no sense, but the mind often does this convoluted thing in order to protect procrastination.

No, but there should be. If interested in collaborating (I made ChatGPT.el), shoot me an email at [email-redacted].

[url-redacted].

Agreed. Our computers are so powerful, do we really need this additional complexity?

And of course, if performance becomes an issue, we can make minor improvements then.