causehealth101

Very interesting. What do you think of metrics like valuation or # of employees?

"Encroach on your ability to WFH" - you perfectly summed up the reason for the vitriol from remote-only people, IMO:

They are fearful that people with your stance will give companies a better argument for less remote-work. It's one thing when executives talk about it, because they're "not on the ground" and "just want control" or "don't understand individual contributors", but when peers like you support non-100% remote, it's a real worrisome prospect for them.

I have a dumb question, tangentially related to this:

Can you set up a non-profit as long as fees and/or donations are limited to expenses (not compensation)?

It's damn near impossible. I admire your restraint :)

You're absolutely right. People do NOT want to hear it, but this is the reality in most cases.

If you search, you'll find that many are not disclosing numbers.

And among those that are, a decent number are finding ways to sidestep the requirement. For example: I saw a bizarre post for a single senior-level tech role. The range was outrageously broad, but the specific numbers were exact, something like $112,899 - $242,782 base salary.

Are you referring to the private booths available at co-working spaces?

Side note: I remember reading that inappropriate behavior occurred between coeds inside the WeWork booths. Sigh.

Good point! So that eliminates the coffee shop - what other spots can accommodate you outside of home?