Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Bluesky strikes a balance between the federated Mastodon and the Twitter walled garden.
Comment · 4 months ago
More distillation please. This is only good for me.
Comment · 4 months ago
I don't think it's right to categorize "no consequences".

Leadership made a decision and that decision was bad. This happens all the time, including allocating budget for staff. Any effective organization is going to judge the outcomes of these types of decisions and it's going to come up in performance and hiring. If this was an isolated situation then possibly they won't fire anyone over it. But you really need the context to judge whether the response was correct.

Wasting company resources and making the company look bad in the press won't be rewarded, and that includes at the board level to the CEO.

Comment · 4 months ago
The “all human access” is doing work also. Most access will likely be from AI agents.
Comment · 6 months ago
You used a secret backup test! Truly honored to see the flamingos. We obviously need them all now ;-)
Comment · 1 year ago
dot-com bubble companies were not good companies. They either built something that was not novel so it could be copied, or had insufficient value to monetize. We'll see the same with current AI.

Similar to the invention of the web, AI is not a bubble. Real value has been created.

Comment · 1 year ago
I think of certain types of knowledge as one way functions. In order to acquire the knowledge you have to search a huge key space or experience costly elimination of options. Once you know the answer it feels obvious and intuitive. We have accumulated so much of this knowledge now that we have a hard time intuitively understanding the gap between people without it and us.
Comment · 2 years ago
You built a database.
Comment · 2 years ago
Like air travel and hotel rooms. Even market based approaches like eBay have different prices for the same things. I'm not for dynamic pricing but it's pretty common.
Comment · 2 years ago
Aren't there wiretapping laws that make recording conversations in certain situations illegal? I love the idea of this type of technology but it seems tricky to deploy from a moral and legal perspective.
Comment · 3 years ago
Tax the billionaires. Tax the vacant real estate holdings at the high end. Tax short term rentals.
Comment · 3 years ago
I'm generally a proponent of soft limits on almost everything. It's better to hit some artificial cap than to end up chewing away on a transaction forever or crashing some service that can't allocate the memory to deal with it. In this case a limit on gems in an account, packs in a transaction, packs in an account, etc.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton