bykhun
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
To be fair, I am pretty sure Claude Code will download and run stockfish, if you task it to play chess with you. It's not like a human who read 100 books about chess, but never played, would be able to play well with their eyes closed, and someone whispering board position into their ear
It's similar to remotion.dev, but focuses on generative video. Uses declarative JSX to orchestrate AI calls, which makes it much more readable!
Another piece of magic sauce: waste the context. Spend the tokens as if you’re partying last time in your life. Throw anything remotely relevant at it.
I haven’t yet found piece of context that made it perform worse. Most of the time the opposite happens - it finds stuff that I haven’t noticed in the big chunks of data I threw at it (error logs, documentation, stack traces)
I remember when I was just learning programming I had a mental block around nested for-loops. I couldn’t trace more than 1000 operations in my head, so I thought that computer wouldn’t be able to as well. To my surprise a computer can easily handle a million operations in a split second.
With AI is a similar feeling, I feel constrained by the amount of my own “RAM”, but once I let go, it almost always surprises me.
I bet status games will stay. Robots may be sexual partners, CEOs and therapists, but they'd never take on status roles in our society – only utility roles.
Same as we do Olympics, even though machines are much better at throwing and lifting than us – we do it to win approval of others
Or maybe at least Typescript-to-WASM compiler to skip JS output?
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/caffeinum; my proof: https://keybase.io/caffeinum/sigs/xhI_n7dLyJd2gGJg6a1lF9TkIxgSg4mA6AK-UxwOc_k ]
wonderfuldev_jjqfqwo90md6qu7nazyswpl7