bvaldivielso
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Yes, in my opinion, but from Zig's success you can see some people are willing to trade safety for a simpler language. Different people have different values
Though to be fair you can also use zig in old C projects, moving things incrementally. I don't know how many projects do that Vs greenfield projects though
Following your example, it'd be like the author of a book buying the book they wrote from someone else. If the author chooses to pay someone else 1000$ for their book, they can, but they will be wasting money.
A company doing a stock buyback is trading off their own capital (they have to spend it, it's not an infinite money glitch where they buy it from themselves) to get back shares of the company itself at the then-market-price. The market chooses whether that's a good trade. It may not
I know that bash does this, and possibly other shells, but it doesn't work in general when you `execv` the file (or when using the subprocess API on python f.i). But cool trick anyway
Doesn't look like that's the case in OP's solution, where HTML tags are transformed into Lua tables. I guess then there's some code that turns the lua tables into the html text to be sent to the client