burtonator
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I've tried asking it factual information, and it asserts that it's incorrect but it will definitely hallucinate questions like the above.
You'd think the reasoning would nail that and most of the chain-of-thought systems I've worked on would have fixed this by asking it if the resulting answer was correct.
By caching them they resume from where it left off from before thereby completely bypassing all that computation.
For large contexts this could save a ton of compute!
I think this feature and structured outputs are some of the biggest inventions in LLMs this year.
I really really want to underscore this point.
You're literally standing on top of ground and under that is boiling water.
If that breaks and you fall in you're going to be in boiling water with no way to get out and you will die screaming.
Also NEVER walk on ground that has no vegetation. If you look around a geyser you will see that the ground is white and has no vegetation. That's because the temperature is too high and it has water under it that's heating the ground.
Walk on that and there's a chance you will fall in.
In the back country there are no fences so you can fall right through the crust.
Agreed on NATO + Ukraine too but I wish they would allow us to strike Russia directly even with NATO equipment.
Correct me if I'm wrong though.
A highly advanced AI could compress the text and predict the next sequences easily.
This seems like a direct connection like electricity and magnetism.
And maybe that's why English needs to be about 1 bit because we're not very intelligent.