bulletsvshumans

"We build evals that test accuracy, saftey and performance before your users do" -- Gotta fix saftey

Hansbxgdggdhd $/$:((:):?,)?:):),()3):)::)€?~?,>~>}>~>>|>|>|>.?.|<gsggxgxggvdyxggs hutch grgsjfjdgdgdgdgegegeftedggdvdh

Differentiates grtr6g &74 g bags

I suppose it shows that it's not an outright innovation in this space, for whatever that is worth.

It's incorporated into pills that appear to be equivalent to prescribed opioids like Oxycodone. From buyer perspective it's just a cheap opioid pill.

There’s game theoretical reasons why a single actor can’t stop it in isolation. To avoid it they need to coordinate, which is more or less what they are proposing.

Get a brain morans.

3

They absolutely could calculate and put the price in the UI if they wished to. Other cloud vendors do.

Democratizing visual communication is arguably useful, for instance helping people to create diagrams that illustrate a concept they wish to convey. This is contingent on the tech working sufficiently well that the visuals are more effective at communication than the text that went into producing them though.

This is also a stylistic choice that the New Yorker magazine uses for words with double vowels where you pronounce each one separately, like coöperate, reëlect, preëminent, and naïve. So possibly intentional.

Dibs

One thing that helps with #2 ('It cannot see') -- Try playwright-cli. Your agent can use it to inspect the DOM, see what styles are applied to elements, simulate clicks, etc.

I presume U.S. Western allies

I had a prototype where the agent primarily worked autonomously, and it could solicit human feedback via tool calls. But yes that pattern does feel like it is hastening the apocalypse.