bryan_rasmussen
Joined 13 years ago
Karma
205
Submissions
41
Member since
Oct 6
Recent submissions
Comment · 12 years ago
hmm, I have to say I haven't had a recaptcha that bad yet, but I have had some bad ones....
But uh... on the first bad recaptcha when trying to guess their password they thought - this recaptcha is ridiculous I will try to solve it of course but just right now I am also going to screenshot it because this is naturally the first thing I think to do!
Comment · 12 years ago
It seems to me that this would only be of interest if it can be shown that an immoral person is not someone that cooperates with other immoral people but not with moral people.
Comment · 12 years ago
I think the author means Korean in that he can't read it. I don't believe Ken Iverson had a Korean connection in making it.
Comment · 12 years ago
If sites can make spammy links to another site and google would then hurt the linked to sites ranking it follows that a profit model would soon arise -> Make spammy links and charge to have links removed.
Has this been seen? Can anyone show a case?
Comment · 12 years ago
eww, biscuits!
Comment · 12 years ago
Hmm, according to the article in the new yorker the food costs for doing it oneself is 50 dollars a month and it was a significant time saving from making food or going out to eat, now if I figure out that it actually works as advertised - why wouldn't I just do what the original inventor did instead of buying it?
Comment · 12 years ago
brackets is open source http://brackets.io/
about this, I use brackets, a lot of it does look like brackets maybe with some ideas taken from light table http://www.lighttable.com/
There's a thread on discuss.atom.io about what distinguishes the two http://discuss.atom.io/t/what-distinguishes-atom-io-from-bra... I guess I don't feel atom does enough different from brackets that I can justify switching editor at this point, but if anyone has more to add than was found there I'm interested to hear.
Comment · 12 years ago
Finally I feel like I understand Java.
Was that too snarky?
Comment · 12 years ago
They made something to facilitate piracy, most probably piracy not done for profit, but did not pirate something and then put it out as their own with the intention to make a profit.
Comment · 12 years ago
gasp I didn't even know what feigned surprise was!
Comment · 12 years ago
I agree with the stupidity on evidence, but Microsoft's taking advantage of that stupidity of course underlines that they will read your email if they think it is to their advantage to do so and can make a legally satisfactory argument.
Comment · 12 years ago
There's a difference between an idea guy and a Proof of concept guy.
Comment · 12 years ago
not necessarily. there's not enough context as to how they got to stripe.
Did they write the url in the address bar of the browser without any other context, or did they do something that signalled what they were going to do.
I bet #2.