brndnbuilds

Thanks for the feedback. I should probably update the site to mention the pricing plans.

Thanks! Maybe one day!

I was thinking of offering both subscription and once off options for private users so folks with subscription fatigue have an option. It'll be subscription only for business users, as that will come with ongoing support. Once off private user cost is likely to be around $79 US. What do you think about that?

Edit: How many machines would you expect to run it on? What would be your expectations for the licence use on multiple machines?

Thankyou to everyone that has contributed to the discussion. I'm logging off for the night but will reply to any questions first thing tomorrow

Appreciate your kind comment!

I suppose we're all here to discuss new things and ideas and Rust is "new". So with that in mind, people may be interested to know how others are experimenting and building with it.

I've been taking to the WireSock creator about this question and will get back to you. It's not a straightforward yes or no and I want to get the answer right.

TIL! Thanks for the explanation

> This app uses a few buttons and text fields

Well it's not finished yet :)

The reasons for choosing Tauri:

- With new projects I try to learn something new but not everything all at once. This helps to not get overwhelmed and ship something in a reasonable timeframe.

- I'm comfortable with HTML, CS, JS and I wanted to learn Rust which Tauri uses.

- I figured the UI is going to change a lot in the early days and I wanted to be able to iterate on it quickly, so choosing something I know already for the UI made sense to me.

- If the project gets bigger, I can move to a JS framework easily enough and will have access to all the ecosystem it provides.

- I thought it would be easier to attract contributors with a web framework UI and Rust.

- While I want it to be as lightweight as possible, it is not going to be run on low spec machines so I feel like the tech stack is fit for purpose.

I think things could get pretty messy running TailScale and another VPN at the same time. I suppose you could do it with IP ranges but process level split tunneling... that needs some thought on what is happening there. Maybe Vadim will have some thoughts on that later.

That is a cool trick. Can you actually define which Firefox tabs use the proxy? Does it highlight the tab in some way to show you which connection you're on?

Another user brought up this feature request a little while ago and I discussed it with the WireSock creator (WireSock is the underlying network driver). Unfortunately we never decided on an implementation plan. I'll add it as a feature request in the repo discussions area.