brian_r_hall
Joined 10 months ago
Joined 10 months ago
The fancy multi-agent / worktree setups are useful later, but I’d start with a really small loop so they understand the basics first. Ask for one change, read the diff, run it, understand it.
If you jump straight into multi-agent stuff, n8n-style nodes, etc., a lot of beginners will just get paralysis by analysis.
What nobody's really talking about is the moment of action itself. Not whether the agent has bash access but whether this specific call should run given what it's actually trying to do right now. That's a completely different problem and nobody's really solved it.
Curious if compression ever shifts how the agent interprets its own scope. Seems like there's a weird edge case hiding in there where you strip just enough context that the policy reasoning breaks down.
We've been approaching it from the policy side, define what the agent is allowed to do upfront and evaluate each action before it runs. Human approval for anything that falls outside the policy. Different tradeoffs but same underlying frustration.
Then you tell the agent that it deleted your whole company database, it says something like "I'm so sorry, I shouldn't have done that. Won't do that again"
As AGI looms overhead, this thought of agents going "rogue" with nothing really stopping them has caused me some panic.