brian_kuan

Yep, exactly right - the publishing mechanism is the anchor schedule.

Regarding incentives, this only works if the customer (or regulation) demands it - they’ll require the checkpoints as a condition of closing the deal - and is part of the bet.

A missed checkpoint is in and of itself visible, so if the vendor sits on records instead of publishing, the customer will notice the silence.

Very cool! Heard on all of that - IMO you didn’t remove the witness, but instead distributed it so that every customer becomes their own witness. The catch is pre-committing catches declared-but-missing, but not the thing nobody put on the list, which is the case security teams fear most.

Would love to hear more about what you’re building!

Proxies are blind to sensitive things enterprises might worry about (eg. the agent read a database, wrote a file, sent an email, etc) as those happen in the agent's own code. That said, if you already run a gateway, its logs can be ingested into the same chain.

Yes to both!

Sending you an email now!

Because they live in infrastructure the vendor itself controls - there's some conflict of interest there. Things like retention, rotation, deletion, what gets included/excluded, etc are all decisions the vendor makes. Same reason why compliance requires audits!

The hash chain doesn't make the log unwritable, it makes any edit detectable.

Fair point - I am a marketer by training and built this with some help from Claude! But appreciate the love.

If you find something/have feedback, please let me know and I'll gladly fix it.

Separately - 100% agree on the witness - only someone/thing outside the vendor can prove nothing was omitted. Who do you think fills that gap - is it an audit firm (my world), a standards body, or something else?

There's no interception - it runs in-process, so it works with any Python code (with or without a framework). There's a TS version too if your stack is in JS.

Would love to hear more about your agent framework!

PS: please try to break it - if you find that the report does not catch a deleted line, changed number, or modified record, I'd love to know!

And to start a discussion: if you sell or buy AI agent products, what do security reviews ask about them?