brennankreiman

Joined 11 years ago

Karma
159
Submissions
31
Member since
Oct 7
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Bart Hendrickx and Bert Vis, Energiya-Buran: The Soviet Space Shuttle, 2007

>The IPM studies were conducted under the leadership of Yuriy Sikharulidze and Dmitriy Okhotsimskiy, two of its leading scientists.

>The IPM studies focused on the Shuttle’s possible use as a bomber, more particularly its capability to launch a nuclear first strike against the United States. Efraim Akin, one of the institute’s scientists, later recalled:

>“When the US Shuttle was announced we started investigating the logic of that approach. Very early our calculations showed that the cost figures being used by NASA were unrealistic. It would be better to use a series of expendable launch vehicles. Then, when we learned of the decision to build a Shuttle launch facility at Vandenberg for military purposes, we noted that the trajectories from Vandenberg allowed an overflight of the main centers of the USSR on the first orbit. So our hypothesis was that the development of the Shuttle was mainly for military purposes. Because of our suspicion and distrust we decided to replicate the Shuttle without a full understanding of its mission. When we analysed the trajectories from Vandenberg we saw that it was possible for any military payload to re-enter from orbit in three and a half minutes to the main centers of the USSR, a much shorter time than [a sub-marine-launched ballistic missile] could make possible (ten minutes from off the coast). You might feel that this is ridiculous but you must understand how our leadership, provided with that information, would react. Scientists have a different psychology than the military. The military, very sensitive to the variety of possible means of delivering the first strike, suspecting that a first-strike capability might be the Vandenberg Shuttle’s objective, and knowing that a first strike would be decisive in a war, responded predictably” [14].

Comment · 7 years ago
Your examples are matters of opinion, the Exxon case is a matter of hiding facts known to the company which are not vague as an opinion of quality.
Comment · 7 years ago
I feel like the youtube channels of OOUKFunkyOO and EELF have pretty good wide variety of new and obscure artists. Great old footage VHS videos set to the music as well.
Comment · 7 years ago
Would be interested to chat some time, I've been doing the same, Uber's H3 has some interesting possibilities for mapping irregular objects.
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 8 years ago
Headphone jack, water resistance, pick one.
Comment · 8 years ago
No PWAs
Comment · 8 years ago
$0.99 or free with all the important features a $19.99 in app purchase each.
Comment · 8 years ago
To be fair Musk was a billionaire before Tesla, and considering a company like fox Conn getting 3 billion or $230,000 a job to make a plant in Wisconsin, Tesla getting a subsidy is par for the course.
Comment · 8 years ago
Similar story as Four Roses rye whiskey, they make most of the rye whiskey in the United States and it all gets relabeled and marked up by branding marketing etc...
Comment · 8 years ago
This seems like the basis for stripe handling amounts in cents to maintain integer values.
Comment · 8 years ago
Separating security updates from general new feature updates would be the key for old phone updates but that is unlikely to happen.
Comment · 8 years ago
Good use of PWA service worker features.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton