brandon
Joined 19 years ago
Joined 19 years ago
My high-level understanding is that they're going to run an ML model over your browsing history (locally on your device) to build a list of "topics" that you care about. Sites you browse can use the Topics API to pull a set of these interests from the browser to show you "relevant" ads. Mozilla has taken a negative position against this standard.
The monthly opex to house and power and cool those servers isn't _negligible_, but if you're doing back of napkin math comparing MRCs to Cloud you can just deduct the costs from their bandwidth charges that have been marked up 10,000%
Except when your team wanted to initially onboard with GOOPS and your request sat in Buganizer for 2 weeks waiting for someone to triage. Uh oh — we're turning down this service next quarter, you will need to go start this onboarding process again with its replacement.
Or when you needed quota in a cell where your product area didn't have Flex. Maybe you can set up a VC with your PARM? Does next week work for your launch plan? Hopefully they can do something for you!
Or when your logs access request sat in GUTS for a month because both of the approvers were on vacation and no, there's not an escalation path.
Or when you needed to change a firewall rule for a project your team inherited which for some reason runs on GCE. Make sure you bring your Ariane link when you open your request. Have ISE reviewed your code? No? ISE currently have a quarter-long backlog, so we're not sure we can grant your firewall exception.
None of these examples are contrived; the weight of the operational bureaucracy is staggering. It may well be that this stuff is felt more on the SRE/Security side around production launches than on the SWE side for experimentation or iterative development, but I struggle with the idea that Google is nimble.
It's significantly more likely that you've been keylogged or phished if attackers are actually accessing your Steam account with passwords of that complexity.
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=5421-QTF...
* You used a modified client or client proxy (this was done for e.g. SSH)
* You used a remote-desktop protocol to remote into a machine with direct network access to the service
* The service got a wholesale exemption and was allowed through the firewall with ordinary IP ACLs
(descending order of impressiveness wrt the BeyondCorp philosophy and whitepaper)
Some of this is discussed in the "Non-HTTP Protocols" section of this paper: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login_win...
Aside, your second point is incorrect. The SteamDB folks have a public write up on analysis of the preload system: https://steamdb.info/blog/steam-download-system/