boffinism
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Yes, specificially this article: http://haggardhawksblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/ampersand.html
> Up until as recently as the mid 1900s, it was standard practice when reciting the alphabet to use the Latin phrase per se (literally “by itself”) to differentiate between individual letters of the alphabet—like A, I, and O—and single-character homographic words—like a, I and O.
> So the letter A would be read as “A per se A”, to ensure it was distinguished from the indefinite article a. The letter I, similarly, would be “I per se I” to differentiate it from the pronoun I. And the letter O would be “O per se O” to differentiate it from the interjection O!
[0] http://haggardhawksblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/ampersand.html
I per se I, O per se O, and and per se and.
And yet one puzzle they hammer Bard for failing is "Cactus Practice". What accent do you have to have for that to be a perfect rhyme?