bobbywilson0

Joined 17 years ago

Karma
580
Submissions
134
Member since
Jan 12
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bobbywilson0; my proof: https://keybase.io/bobbywilson0/sigs/5TolA_aLusVRt00X0XEGgCdBq9PYovv5BE5UugxO634 ]
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
If we only had doSQL() for everything.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
That reminds me of something sort of similar I observed. I was driving with a friend who drives all day for a living. He said that the fellow drivers told him that if you want to get over and you're in heavy traffic, roll down the window, and say "Hi there, do you mind letting me in?" I watched him do it and sure he showed me putting on his blinker didn't work at all, but the direct ask always worked.
Comment · 2 years ago
Cool analysis with GPT-4o! I was doing some messing around with the same dataset recently around the "Who is Hiring" and "Who wants to be hired". Although I was just using pandas and spacy. (I was job supply and demand with the US FED interest rates here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bobbywilson0/hn-whos-hirin...)

I can actually see how nice it would be for an llm to be able to disambiguate 'go' and 'rust'. However, it does seem a bit disappointing that it isn't consolidating node.js and nodejs or react-native and react native.

I'm curious on the need to do use selenium script to google to iterate, here's my script: https://gist.github.com/bobbywilson0/49e4728e539c726e921c79f.... Just uses the api directly and a regex for matching the title.

Thanks for sharing!

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
My main purpose of tools like these has always been prototypes, or hobby one-off type stuff. For SPAs, or a sketch with a Jupyter notebook. They're great for this sort of thing because in my experience, this used to require building some sort of API just to get a simple json interface to the database. It was my understand that the purpose of these types of tools was mostly that.

Are folks using these kind of things for non-trivial production applications?

Comment · 9 years ago
disclosure: I used to work at Galvanize as an instructor, a couple years ago.

I don't have any connection to Galvanize now so I don't feel the need to defend or promote bootcamps, but I do feel like I have some knowledge on the situation. When I was instructing I was constantly worried about there being enough jobs for my students. This was also when the startup market was "hotter" than it is now. The thing that I came to realize looking back is that there is actually still a huge amount of steady demand for software engineers.

It isn't necessarily startups though. I have definitely heard from startups that they feel like they are inundated with bootcamp grads. I think part of the reason is because working at a cool startup is part of the picture that is painted to perspective students.

The less exciting (to the graduates) opportunity is working with big companies that are replacing their previous outsourced staff with internal junior engineers. They also didn't want to hire one or two grads, they were interested in hiring five to ten.

To me at least it seems like larger companies are trying to adjust their staffing to accommodate a more fluid staff that comes and goes rather than the longer term employees of previous generations. Which includes always having a broad opportunity for new employees, which dovetails into the bootcamps constantly producing graduates.

Comment · 10 years ago
Most, if not all of the previous tech they abandoned seemed too early at the time. It forced those who were making products for Apple to follow their lead. Apple has always tried to reduce clutter with design, and a lot of that times it means getting rid of something that doesn't seem like it need to be removed, e.g. limited ports, no removable micro sd for iPhone, wireless devices and accessories, removing drives, soldering in laptop parts. There is a population of people that absolutely despise Apple for doing this. This seems like a classic 80/20 situation where the 80% don't have the need for a headphone jack or are willing to use wireless headphones and be fine with that. While the 20% are upset because like many of the replies below people have specific use cases for why they need it.

It is more likely that we will see other manufacturers drop the headphone jack as well because Apple did. Again, most people will be fine with that. Bluetooth headphones and ear pieces have already been around for awhile. You also have to think about Apple's purchase of Beats Audio.

With that said I will concede that I am also a bit bummed about them removing the port now as well, but I have learned that Apple is incredibly stubborn when it comes to listening to their consumers about these decisions, and you just have to abide, or buy something else.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton