Recent submissions

Comment · 3 months ago
Their entire analysis is based on the assumption that Pangram 3.3 is a reliable tool for detecting AI-generated content. What if not?
Comment · 5 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
and openclaw.com is a law firm.
Comment · 10 months ago
Most of what the author discovered is real and technically correct, but it is also undocumented, unsupported, and risky to rely on.

GitHub has changed node ID internals before, quietly. If they add a field to the MessagePack array, switch encodings, encrypt payloads, introduce UUID-backed IDs..

every system relying on this will break instantly.

Comment · 11 months ago
Comment · 11 months ago
I fired up a 5$ Hetzner server, and then scanned 10k+ wordpress plugins for security issues, errors, warnings etc using .. it took around 5 days to complete..

and this is the result:

https://www.pluginscore.com/

Under the hood, it uses the official Plugin Check (via wp plugin check) and PHP_CodeSniffer with the WordPress standards, plus some extra checks for plugin repo requirements and performance. So its basically the plugin check but with a web interface. There are some false positives in the scan results but it gives an overall picture about a plugin.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton