Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
[deleted]
Comment · 9 years ago
Very basic comparison. Doesn't go into the quality of the generated code, compiler speed or efficiency, etc.
Comment · 12 years ago
Gotta love Android. No recourse short of custom and/or rooting
Comment · 12 years ago
Beer to calm the mind. Reduces working set. Encourages focus too. If done sparingly, can temporarily relief mold stress also.
Comment · 12 years ago
I suspect he/she is referring to Bevel. Although I think the commenter fails to realize the value add of the product.
Comment · 14 years ago
If this is hypocritical, so is paying the lower tax rate than his secretary, even thought he complains about it. Anyone thinking its hypocritical is missing the point. He does it to show it exists. Sure, you can not do it, and donate to the government on your own, but that's not fixing the problem. The small number of donators can't fix the deficit on their own. It takes a law that required everyone to play ball in order to fix the problem.
Comment · 14 years ago
It always seems to be this time of year for musicians lately. James Brown was Xmas 2006. Etta James and Johnnie Otis were January 2012...
Comment · 14 years ago
Still can't mark emails important or not important. Disappointed...
Comment · 14 years ago
What region of the world? Does "startup" refer only to new, science/engineering based businesses?
Comment · 14 years ago
Next VPS will be in Europe :-D
Comment · 14 years ago
Both are deception. How one is worse than the other I have no idea. The difference is, due to our capitalist upbringing, the former is considered justified and just "our way of doing business". That's probably rather unique (this distinction you're drawing) compared to less capitalist cultures.
Comment · 14 years ago
This is different because of what is being cut. I can't remember having used one of those "goodies". They end up like the "toys" that come in cereal boxes: junk you throw out every Spring. And something as personal as a case is something stylish people would rather pick out themselves.

Firstly, we're basically talking about the mission statement of the retail stores. It was originally to provide a great experience. Now it is maximize profit. This is definitely a big deal. No longer giving away junk was not a change of Apple's mission statement.

What does that mission statement mean to the customer? Well... I would lean towards believing many customers are loyal to Apple due to quality. It is logical to think Apple believe[s,d] in quality because it lends to customer satisfaction, which lends to brand loyalty. If customer satisfaction is no longer their driving motivation... does that mean Apple has killed the very reason their customers are loyal to them? Those "goodies" probably were never considered the very reason Apple has brand loyalty. If it was, Apple was able to change that reason to a new reason (quality).

Secondly, how much a customer can trust the word of a salesman is often determined by whether the salesman is commission or not... there's a reason people pay attention to it. This is far larger than no longer giving away items which were never used & thrown away. Although the employee don't seem to be paid via commission now, they basically still are (points tallied on how many high profit items are sold).

Comment · 14 years ago
The main thing keeping me from switching from AT&T to ST right now is 1) the disconnect fee (1.4 yrs left on my contract and 2) iPhone 5, if unlocked like 4S, will probably be 4G and might not get as good of speeds on ST

This is how they luck us in, even though we'd truly prefer to be somewhere else.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton