betterhealth12
Joined 6 years ago
Karma
8
Submissions
24
Member since
Mar 4
Recent submissions
Comment · 5 months ago
Aki here, founder of Credible AI.
I made this using our own tool (skim.plus/chrome), which pulls the key claims out of a long video and lays the timelines and conflicts of interest next to each one. Happy to talk through how the analysis works or what we're building, or how this could apply to your use case.
Comment · 10 months ago
- Facts are claims that are citing matter-of-fact reporting, public data, sequences of events etc.
- Opinion statements are ones where its clearly the author's perspective or take on what's being reported on - the embedded reasons show the explanations in context.
- Dubious claims usually highlight either exaggeration of some sort, or manipulative argumentation including extreme emotional language, appeals to authority and such
Comment · 10 months ago
appreciate the question and I understand the concern. Our algorithm will balance for this by surfacing and allowing discovery of novel ideas even if they don't have the strongest weight yet - as the source of that idea gets validated over time, their own track record will be used as a proxy for the quality of their future ideas.
The idea is that by relying on their eventual track record rather than just an individual claim, we can surface and reward novel ideas that have merit too.
Comment · 1 year ago
Hey - would love to connect about this, I am going to be in a group of founders where others might be interested as well so could even organize a group session. Please get in touch.
Comment · 1 year ago
I watched this story and couldn't believe it when the actor responds to the anchor,
"That I know of that have lost money (to scammers impersonating him)? It's in the 100s...
I see people come to my appearances and look at me like we've had a relationship online for a couple of years and I'm like, no, I'm so sorry, I don't know who you are. It's so sad, and you see the devastation."
youtube.com/watch?v=ghmvOP6Daso
At 1:52:00 in this DOAC video Steven says his team spends 30% of their time sorting through deepfake ads, to the extent he had to hire someone whose exclusive job is to spot scam videos and report them to FB etc:
https://youtu.be/JMYQmGfTltY?si=ntuDgXuhMYj2fh5z&t=6706
I feel like there's a big undercurrent brewing but because the individual damages are not high enough and victims have limited recourse, nothing significant happens.
Comment · 1 year ago
I think it's time to build a new system - something that can annotate the post the user is on, if there's at least another savvy user (or AI system) that can pick up on the uncanny signals. This youtube video about the "Walker Family" sham on Facebook is particularly relevant here:
Don’t Pay This AI Family To Write You a Song - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-DDHSfBBeo
Comment · 1 year ago
@knicholes & @pil0u - I am working on a system that would prevent this exact same scenario. I appreciate the docs write up, given that you were personally impacted by this and are passionate about it, I'd love to speak.
I feel like the scale at which this is happening cross-internet must be staggering but because this is small-scale and un-reportable theft - who would the average person even go to, if they willingly sent the money, and they'd also have to get over the embarrassment of having fallen for it.
What really got me thinking about the scale of this is watching the deepfake discussion at 1:51:46 in this video (at 1:52:00 he says his team spends 30% of their time sorting through deepfake ads, to the extent he had to hire someone whose exclusive job is to spot these scam videos and report them to FB etc):
Comment · 1 year ago
What are your thoughts on this being solved by the negative of the situation? So, instead of having to vet every single stream, tweet etc to check if it's legit, basically the idea is that you shouldn't "trust" what you are seeing unless it's explicitly endorsed via a signature from the original creator.
Obviously, if it's coming from their official channels the "signature" can be more obvious, but a layer that facilitates this could do a lot of good imo.
Comment · 1 year ago
Another decade, another attempt? We are aiming for this with our work at Credible (https://mycredible.ai and our chrome extension) - product is still early, I'd be curious to get your first thoughts or reaction.
Comment · 1 year ago
do you have a point of view of this type of collaborative approach applied to other areas, for example, collective understanding for groups of people? We are working on something in that space.
Comment · 1 year ago
I resonate with this in a major way. A couple of times now we have received feedback around the product, branding etc when I've gone from not even considering any changes to the new direction being fully implemented within the product in 48H. This was unthinkable when you were part of a "machine" within a larger enterprise however nimble it may have been. The internal friction that comes up whenever you're thinking about a product change - because of the PTSD from the drawn out discussions in my prior roles - almost needs to be unlearned and coaxed out!
mycredible.ai mycredible.ai/chrome