beschizza

The instant emergence of vibe-coded app-guide websites on top of the the vibe-coded apps themselves, it's like a turducken of obliterated human agency

Smol was the only one to answer a basic question about javascript correctly, but I loved this answer from L20 Edu:

Prompt: I'm writing a vanilla javascript and HTML text adventure game. The player will use the keyboard to switch between screens or to choose storylet options in the main screen. Game is turn-based. What is the the best method in javascript to detect keypresses?"

Answer: I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway, I'm a good player. Anyway,

The author doesn’t mention it, so it seems appropriate to suggest asking a doctor for attention deficit disorder screening. The cultural forces in play encouraging us to flit and switch constantly are a perfect distraction from the possibility one’s own brain is complicit.

This article describes well how advertising and such degrades the quality of the product, but it isn’t really enshittification unless the platform is also turning the screw on its suppliers. This might be the case for services downstream of frontier model providers, but OpenAI and friends aren’t turning the screw on NVidia or utilities.

If anything them trying to do the customer-side enshittification before securing both ends of their market is just a sign that they’re troubled and will likely not ever reach that point.

“greenest punk should be able to bend over and take it.”

Nothing in this suggests consensual self insertion. Perhaps being “Schrodinger’s asshole” was the idea here? The meaning of “punk” in prison context is not ambiguous.

I grew up with these just as they were beginning to age and part of the challenge was getting the dated Basic to run on newer machines. The blend of clear instruction and evocative old-school art remains fantastic and I want to write updated ones.

Pico-8 or Lua more generally might be a good language target. But I rather think a bespoke environment/interpreter would be the right way to go for the project.

See also the Usborne world of the future, ghosts, monsters etc. they were all magical!

What's great about this comment is it gets two things wrong: the conclusion of the study (which found reductions across the board in fuckedupedness) and the drug being studied (Ritalin, not Adderall i.e. "speed")

Without even looking at anything else, I love the name.

A key difference between Sinclair and Jobs was Sinclair's hostility to quality control and UX. Cheap at all costs! I would liken Sinclair to Jay Miner, perhaps: an engineering genius with a tendency to hit the reset button on business affairs over and over again.

Closer to Jobs in the UK scene was--and I know this is maybe a funny claim--Alan Sugar. The key similarity being the mid-1980s intuition that computers needed to be simple all-in-one consumer products. Jobs was tuned to the needs of the creative and professional classes, whereas Sugar was aiming for working class families, so the machines were very different.

But the reality is there aren't easy matches. The UK didn't produce people who were good at computers, good at business, and had access to enough capital to achieve escape velocity in the 1980s. Even when ARM bore fruit it was sold off, same as everything else there.

Presumably "provider of service" rather than "service provider"

ie

"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by an other information content provider."

I remember the Amiga 500 being extremely cool in the UK, the essential gift for teens in xmas 89/90. So I'm curious about the context where for Dominik Diamond it was uncool.

It would have a custom GPU that will remain conspiciously better than anything available for less than $1000 for three years. You could imagine an in-house "NVidia game console" that does this, perhaps? But surely a terrible business plan for whatever it has in its technology pipeline.