bennyvasquez
Joined 6 years ago
Karma
14
Submissions
18
Member since
Sep 8
Recent submissions
Comment · 2 years ago
You're absolutely right, and we're actually working on that. We're bringing it back into alignment with the next generation. We talked about that a little bit here: https://almalinux.org/blog/2024-01-31-elevate-updates/
Comment · 2 years ago
The AlmaLinux Engineering Steering Committee acts as the central meeting point for collaboration between everyone working on anything related to the AlmaLinux Project. By having open discussions and inviting viewpoints from everyone that touches AlmaLinux, we ensure AlmaLinux continues to serve its community.
Comment · 2 years ago
That's a bummer! I know there's a few places that have used it on the 50k+ scale, so once the kinks for your environment, it should be great. If there's anything that can be done to improve the script, we'd love to help! Feel free to join the chat and share what's up in ~migrations.
Comment · 2 years ago
AlmaLinux matches releases and versions with RHEL. More clarification in this 2-minute video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNMnajmyLaA
Comment · 2 years ago
AlmaLinux matches releases and versions with RHEL. More clarification in this 2-minute video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNMnajmyLaA
Comment · 2 years ago
Our primary difference: a 10-year lifecycle, with a focus on stability.
I'd say that your use case for CentOS might have been vendor compliance, but our user base doesn't agree that's the only use case.
I'd recommend listening to this podcast with Neal Gompa about Red Hat vs IBM at this point:
https://hackaday.com/2023/12/27/floss-weekly-episode-763-fed...
Comment · 2 years ago
A week after RHEL 8.9
Comment · 3 years ago
Sure! That's likely an accurate representation. I also just gave this talk that goes a bit deeper, if that's helpful/interesting: https://youtu.be/Jjda39dlu7I
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Built entirely without RHEL sRPMs