Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
It is naive to believe that these 86%, assuming the numbers are true, have any impact on the food production at all.

Of all the cropland we have, 57% is used to produce human food and 43% is used to produce animal food.

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets#more-plant-based-d...

The whole point is that you need way more crops in general to "produce" the same amount of calories & proteins. That's because feeding the animals with crops instead of eating them is highly inefficient in comparison to eating them directly. "As an example: beef has an energy efficiency of about 2%. This means that for every 100 kilocalories you feed a cow, you only get 2 kilocalories of beef back."

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets#livestock-waste-a-...

With how much meat is eaten right now, there is just no way we have enough grazing land to produce enough meat. 99% of meat comes from factory farms. [1] These animals are always fed with crops, so there will always be land usage to product food for animals. And it is way more inefficient.

[1]: https://www.livekindly.com/99-animal-products-factory-farms/

Comment · 3 years ago
You're quoting a literal farming foundation, so here is a neutral source:

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use#half-of-the-world-s-habi...

"If we combine pastures used for grazing with land used to grow crops for animal feed, livestock accounts for 77% of global farming land. Of all the land we use for agriculture, 77% of it is used for livestock."

These 77% are only responsible for 18% of the produced calories and 37% of the produced proteins.

So, if you leave out water consumption and most importantly animal walfare, eating meat is the worst thing you can to for the environment (when talking about food).

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Isn't it ironic that even the writers of this article don't follow these rules in the examples on that page?

There is "Mistake 3: Not Enabling Keepalive Connections to Upstream Servers", where it says:

    In the location{} block that forwards requests to an upstream group, include the following directives along with the proxy_pass directive:

    proxy_http_version 1.1;
    proxy_set_header   "Connection" "";
Then, at "Mistake 10: Not Taking Advantage of Upstream Groups", the "location" block does not include these two directives, even though the "upstream" block contains a "keepalive" directive.
Comment · 5 years ago
> are already searching for the wrong tool from the beginning

Agreed, that's why I wrote "realizing" and not "having". Some devs use Redux as a hammer when they actually need a screwdriver - they just don't know better.

Comment · 5 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton