benmdi

Joined 8 years ago

Karma
90
Submissions
38
Member since
May 16
t: @BenDiFrancesco w: https://www.buildblockchain.tech
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Fun quick read. Scary part to me is that this seems like something that could actually happen pretty easily.
Comment · 6 years ago
> You can't be tied to the dollar without backing your coin with dollars.

Not exactly. There are projects like Maker and sUSD which create synthetic dollar equivalents via collateralization with native crypto assets. (Caveat here, Maker did recently add USDC, an IOU backed stablecoin, as collateral as an emergency measure. Unclear if that change will be permanent or not).

Comment · 7 years ago
Based on recent events, I'm sure this will be well received...
Comment · 7 years ago
Well said. Exactly right.
Comment · 7 years ago
Some general backend and web work, and some blockchain stuff as well.

The latter is the opposite set of tradeoffs. Completely permissionless, but lots of riff-raff and scammy nonsense going on.

Comment · 7 years ago
Yeah, I agree. I hope the legal system forces Apple to allow opt-in third party app stores. Would go a long way towards alleviating these kinds of situations.
Comment · 7 years ago
Those situations are in no way comparable. It's wild to me you think they are.

No one is saying they are responsible for promoting your app. What we're saying is that if they're going to lock down their platform so that you can't install apps without going through their store, then they shouldn't arbitrarily, with no explanation, destroy years of good will thats been built up by genuinely building and delivering a high quality app people love.

I think you're suffering from the "just world bias", honestly. Look it up if you haven't heard of it. TL;DR is that as much as you want to believe they don't, shitty, unfair things happen everyday. Pretending they don't doesn't help the situation.

Comment · 7 years ago
This is just another way of saying "Apple doesn't give a f*ck about indie developers." Might be true, but it's still shitty.
Comment · 7 years ago
That's a BS answer, and if it's the one Apple wants to give, then they should not be surprised when they 1) are seen by devs as a unattractive platform to build a business on 2) Get treated like a monopolist in courts.
Comment · 7 years ago
Generally I agree, though this App does have a broad enough market that it could probably be sold as sustainably as a one-time upgrade for years without exhausting the potential, especially if it's a one man project.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton