Recent submissions

Comment · 5 months ago
It will be abused. Usually free (counter) speech is the only reliable solution in the long run.
Comment · 5 months ago
This is not only undemocratic, but it’s essentially a mild form of censorship.
Comment · 6 months ago
No x?
Comment · 10 months ago
Author here!

I built a bash script to manage deployments of multiple applications to a single Dokku server. I made this after I was paying like 30$+ a month on DigitalOcean, and wanted to move fast to a different VPS

What it does:

  - Import existing servers - Run ./deploy.sh --import ./apps --ssh your-server to clone all your apps, export their config (domains, ports, storage, postgres, letsencrypt), and env vars

  - Migrate between servers - Import from old server, change SSH config, deploy to new server

  - Multi-app orchestration - One config.json manages multiple independent repos

  - Hierarchical configuration - Parent settings cascade to deployments, children can override

  - Smart deploys - Skips unchanged apps by comparing git commits

  - Tag-based filtering - --tag staging or --tag api to deploy subsets

  - Secrets via .env files - Hierarchical: _api (shared) → api.example.com (specific)
Pure bash, requires only jq. No daemon, no external services.
Comment · 10 months ago
I would like to add:

Weaknesses / Counters:

1) Surrogate endpoint only — HPV PCR positivity is not a clinical outcome; no CIN2/3, no cancer, no mortality measured

2) Correlation ≠ causation — HPV-cancer link is epidemiological association; Koch's postulates not fulfilled in traditional sense; detecting DNA doesn't prove pathogenic activity

3) PCR detection ≠ disease — Transient HPV infections are common and clear spontaneously; most HPV-positive women never develop lesions or cancer

4) Type replacement signal ignored — 66% higher incidence of non-vaccine HR types in vaccinated group is dismissed rather than investigated as potential clinical concern

5) No long-term clinical follow-up — Cervical cancer takes 15-30 years to develop; this 7-year study cannot assess actual cancer prevention

6) Confounding in vaxxed vs unvaxxed comparison — Unvaccinated group is small (n=859), likely differs in health behaviors, screening adherence, socioeconomic factors

7) Circular reasoning — Vaccine "works" because it reduces detection of the types it targets; says nothing about whether those types were actually causing disease in this population

8) Assumes HPV16/18 reduction = cancer reduction — Untested assumption; clinical benefit must be demonstrated, not inferred from PCR

9) High baseline HR-HPV in vaccinated group unexplained — 32% prevalence of other HR types suggests substantial ongoing oncogenic exposure despite vaccination

10) Genome validity unestablished — HPV reference genomes are in-silico constructs assembled computationally; never validated by sequencing purified, isolated viral particles; PCR/sequencing performed on mixed clinical samples where true origin of amplified fragments is indeterminate

Comment · 2 years ago
RCT? Doesn’t look like it…
Comment · 4 years ago
Well said. If there's no true freedom of speech, we've lost everything. The last two years offered already a glimpse... Now look at China. It's mind blowing. Poor people.
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
I’m so tired of these pseudo science modelers. We have seen where it leads us with covid. Humans tend to overestimate their importance.
Comment · 5 years ago
I'm refusing to fly the MAX, period! The plane is flawed by design...

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton