benjaminjosephw
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
[0] - https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/inotifywait.1.html
Is "don't be evil" still part of the Google's official ethos?
There's something deeply satisfying about recursive tools who's inputs can include the definition of the tool itself. Brilliant.
Building in public is very much an experimental form of communication. It's a new way to think and operate and it's not something with a strong set of conventions and norms. That means that you have to think much more about how you're communicating, not just what you want to say.
Building in community means sharing information with a specific set of people who have a shared perspective. Conventions and norms do exist and you have a good sense of how people will interpret and understand your words. This is the kind of context where it is easier to be more authentic and less performative.
I think that a good chunk of people who build in public whould say that they are actually building in community. They get the sense of a shared perspective and the community has established some its own conventions and norms. I don't think there's always a clear seperation between these two concepts.
As an interesting example of how these two concepts overlap is in the Zig community[0]. The community is decentralized - does that mean they are building in community AND in public?
Isn't access control a set of patterns rather than a service? When did it stop being a core competency of web applications?
How far do you take efficiency as a measure of communication quality?
Did Kevin have it right when he asks "why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?"[0]
Domain experts being able to solve their own problems sounds is a worthwhile objective for software tools but innovation in this space has been surprisingly sparce.
I've been searching for other examples of end-user programmmable tools beyond spreadsheets for inspiration. Anyone have suggestions of some other places these kinds of "folk interfaces" show up?
EthicalAds does not comply with the intent of a user who sends a DNT request. It's not obliged to, but it's a bit disingenuous to claim that the request has been honoured in some way.