belladoreai

classic neal.fun

You can find many references by googling some variations of keywords Docker, Windows, brick

"Bricking" is when your electronic device stops working, i.e. becomes a brick. Docker is known to occasionally brick Windows machines.

Yep, it's super powerful.

I would say that the "more secure way" is to just use ComfyUI without installing any obscure nodes from unknown developers. You can do pretty much anything using just the default nodes and the big node packs.

Well, Docker is great for this as long as you're not one of the unlucky few whose machine is bricked because of Docker. So, mostly yes, I suppose.

The person who created the custom node is the same person who "hacked" it. Whether or not the account is technically owned by some unrelated civilian is not important, because there is no other activity on the account.

Okay, sure. But if we have an account which has never had any legitimate activity on it ever - an account that has only ever been used to push malware - then I don't know if it matters much who is the "rightful owner" of the account. Things would be different if the GitHub account had some legitimate activity before the "hack".

I have not seen a statement from Nullbulge so it's not appropriate to say that they took over the repo.

The author of the repo is claiming that their repo is hacked, but this is an obvious lie, because their very first GitHub commit is the one where they push the malware. Nobody would hack an empty GitHub account.

I don't know if the author of the repo is lying when they say that Nullbulge is behind the attack (perhaps the author is part of Nullbulge, perhaps not).

It was an extension for ComfyUI, which has 37k stars on GitHub. The way ComfyUI is commonly used is that a person shares a "workflow" file, which utilizes various obscure extensions (called "custom nodes") and then the people who want to run the workflow on their own computer will install all these obscure custom nodes that have like 40 stars on GitHub or so.

Well, I asked for evidence and nobody provided any.

"The invisible spaghetti monster exists! It's just invisible so you can't see it!"

Where's the evidence that there's any significant use of NSFW AI by women?

This is not true at all. I'm active in multiple NSFW AI Discords and Subreddits, and looking at the type of material people engage with, almost all of it is very clearly targeted at heterosexual men. I'm not even aware of any online communities that would have NSFW AI stuff targeting mainly female audience.